Tuesday 11 March 2014

Reflections on a Scottish Cup Quarter-final



It's famously been 80 years since Albion Rovers last reached a Scottish Cup quarter-final. Standing between them on this occasion was the might of Rangers, a club that (in its former guise, at least) has done rather better in the intervening eight decades.

Of course, few among the Albion Rovers faithful were expecting a win but we were hoping that the team would give a better account of itself than it did in the 4-0 reversal earlier in the season in the League Cup. Rovers-Rangers games are something like buses - you wait ages for them and then two come along in quick succession.

The Rovers team warms up
I arrived at Ibrox early, to soak in something of the "atmosphere" - which only served to remind me why I support Albion Rovers (and Morton, my "second" team). Everywhere were expressions of the supposed joys of sectarianism, and that supporting Rangers has something to do with a gross misunderstanding of the complexities of Northern Irish politics. The Rangers fans came with their banners proclaiming their (to me, rather confused) identity, while the Albion Rovers contingent were obviously simply out to enjoy themselves.

Ah, the joys of sectarianism!
It is not only the misplaced identity with sectarianism that I struggle with, the the near tangible sense of entitlement that many Rangers fans still seem to have. Sitting just feet away from Rangers supporters, it was difficult to avoid hearing some of the asides aimed at us an our "wee team". Yes, a team that - until the end of last season - was playing in a higher division than they were. Some Rangers fans were already dismissing the opposition and talking about where they would want to be sitting at the final. Still, these are supporters and at least one of them appears only to buy a ticket to have an opportunity to goad the visiting fans - not once during the entire 90 minutes did he once look at the game...but surely those running club are now free from such arrogance? They will have a bit more insight into their current circumstances, yes?

Erm, no. In his programme notes captain Lee McCulloch reflected on the embarrassment of drawing with Stenhousemuir, while also making a comparision of sorts with Albion Rovers: "it is 80 years since Rovers reached the last eight...but it's going on five years now since we last won the Cup and for Rangers that is too long." OK. So, "wee" clubs like ours can wait almost a century for a semi-final and that's fine, but Rangers, well, they're such a special club that it's completely wrong that their supposed divine right to win everything has evaporated. Not much humility in that statement from the Rangers captain, but enough of an arrogant sense of self-entitlement to make every Rovers fan reading those words to hope our team can bring him down a peg or two.
The teams line up. 

But that's enough of Rangers. Let's talk about the game.

Rovers kicked off and within two minutes almost took the lead when Liam Cusack's well-hit shot flew wide of the Rangers goal. Rangers, not taking this warning very seriously, threw a great deal forward looking for the opening goal. By some miracle, and some incredibly astute and solid defending, Rangers don't score. And then, on 13 minutes, another miracle happens: Rovers string a few League Two passes together and win a corner. From the resulting corner, Lee McCulloch (yes, him) connects with the cross - commiting the schoolboy error of attempting a pass across the face of a crowded goal - and Ciaran Donnelly connects to give us the lead.

Our first quarter-final in 80 years? Let's have a party!
This takes everyone by surprise, including the Rovers fans. We all forgot where we were and started singing. Not accustomed to loud renditions of non-sectarian songs, a few of the Rangers fans tried to tell some of our more vocal supporters that they didn't appreciate visiting support making quite so much noise. Not that we cared.

Rangers obviously expected that all they had to do was keep possession and wait for us to meekly capitulate. This is the only way that I can satisfactorily explain their unadventurous tactics of aiming predictable crosses at static forwards, and resorting to pot shots from outside the box. On the rare occasions that they did work openings, the finishing was profligate to say the least. It was as if Peter van Vossen and Erik Bo Anderson were making comebacks.

The Rovers defence stood firm, making a string of heroic tackles and interventions. Our keeper, Neil Parry, was in good form and looked to increase in confidence as the match wore on. At half-time, with the score at 1-0 and Rangers' lack of imagination clear for all to see, Rovers fans started to believe it could be our day.

The scoreboard tells the story. As do the emptying stands.
And it deserved to be. But for a controversial incident on 78 minutes both teams would have got what they deserved: Rangers, elimination from the competition (they did, however, get the fully merited treatment from their own fans) and for Rovers a semi-final place (although the chairman will be happy with the financial rewards of a replay). Unfortunately, a hopeful hoof upfield was chased by the hugely unimpressive Bilel Mohsni who appeared to either collide with the goalkeeper or handle the ball on its way into the net. For a few seconds, no-one was quite sure what was happening. And then, without consulting his assistant, the referee walked off towards the centre circle.

I've watched the replays several times. My reaction at the time was that the referee had made an enormous mistake. On reviewing the evidence, I don't see how the referee can have allowed it to stand - at least not without consulting the better-placed man on the line. It's questionable whether Mohsni made much contact at all, but if he did it's with his arm. And if that isn't a foul on the keeper, then nothing is. I suppose it isn't for nothing that Scottish referees were sponsored by Specsavers.

Rangers didn't endear themselves to us with their unsportsmanlike conduct. When Parry put the ball out of play for a player to receive treatment, we didn't expect for Rangers not only to refuse to return the ball but launch an attack. And when Chris Dallas went down injured, the pitiful attempts from some Rangers fans to suggest he was timewasting when he'd just been forced out of the biggest game of his career were a bit much.

Throughout the match, Rangers fans made their feelings known. They were less than impressed, as well they might be. It might have been sporting if some of them applauded the Rovers' players efforts at the final whistle, but by that point many had already left and were now on twitter and facebook, talking about meltdown and crisis because a "joke team" had out-thought, if not out-played, them. Fortunately the Rovers fans, still in party mood, stayed behind and applauded their team.

It was a historic occasion. Personally, after already beating Motherwell and Stenhousemuir in the previous rounds I'd have preferred anyone other than Rangers away in the quarter-finals simply because I have little truck for what Rangers represent on a commercial and cultural level. Dumbarton at home would have been perfect! However, I am proud to have seen my team in the quarter-finals of a Scottish Cup - something that many Rovers supporters have never experienced - and to have been just 12 minutes away from an improbable semi-final place was incredible.

It's the final whistle and Albion Rovers have won - 1-1!
(You get the point.)
Seeing Ally McCoist on TV defending the referee's decision just underlines what a great day it was for us.

We now have a replay at home (wherever that will be - almost definitely not Cliftonhill) and we'll have to do it all again. We know Rangers are beatable.

Thanks should go to the stewards who were fantastic toward the visiting support, and to Rovers themselves for the tremendous way they attempted to ensure that every Rovers fan, even exiled supporters, had the opportunity to be at such a historic game. Jeers, however, to the TV crew who, having the Scottish Cup in their possession allowed Rangers fans the opportunity to have their pictures taken with it, without thinking that some Rovers' fans might like the same opportunity.

The best thing about this quarter-final was not simply that we got something of a result. It was that, at the end of it, it was not just about Rangers. We were not simply a team that had got that far only to capitulate to a supposedly "big" club for the dubious privilege of being labeled "plucky" by the Daily Record. The team, the club and our fans did themselves, Coatbridge and Scottish football proud. Well done, everyone!

12 comments:

Diggy said...

Nice report.

Good luck in the replay and I'm sure you can take Dundee Utd in the semi if you defend well, and take one of your couple of chances.

Andrew said...

It seems people are discussing this post elsewhere. That's great even if you take a different view - it's good to know I'm contributing to a wider discussion.

Some points I should clarify though:

1) I did not say Rovers "outplayed" Rangers. I said they "out-thought, if not out-played, them." Please read carefully if you are planning to quote!
2) The picture labeled "Ah, the joys of sectarianism!" is not intended to be "evidence". However, one commenter elsewhere noted that this was simply a number of people waving union flags - this is not so. King Billy flags and some bearing other sectarian slogans were very much on show.
3) Of course I'm writing as an Albion Rovers supporter - what else do you expect?

Otherwise, thanks for all the constructive comments especially on twitter. Cheers!

Anonymous said...

Good luck to albion in the replay

Andrew said...

Thanks anonymous- I think we'll need a bit of luck. I'd guess Rangers won't play with such a lack of imagination on Monday. But we've got some belief now - should be a good game!

Anonymous said...

Great description of an experience of a sporting contest at Ibrox. Best wee country in the world. Wait till the new club force admin and go into a stronger league next year with a weaker squad. Your percieved disadvantage will steamrollered by other fans outcomes. Jam tarts especially!!

Anonymous said...

Hi Andrew,
I enjoyed reading your article on your wonderful day out at the Scottish Cup quarter final. Hopefully, you will be doing a follow up on the replay and that it will be a favourable result for the rovers. I watched the match on television and your team were magnificent, undeserving the poor decision to award a goal for what was a clear foul and a handball into the bargain! Criticising the "peepul's" team and/or their support does not go down well with the dillusionals that frequent ibrox nowadays and I wish you well on that score, however the truth hurts and I won't be reading any articles of this nature in the mainstream press in this country anytime soon. Take care fella, and keep writing how it is because the away support that "follow follow" the new club are "interesting" and should keep you tapping away on the keyboard for hours after the match.

Andrew said...

Thanks, both of you!

It was indeed a "sporting contest" at Ibrox and that's how it should be remembered. Rangers, now having secured the championship and with it promotion, will no doubt find next year more tricky.

As for the "goal that shouldn't have been" - I'm a former referee, albeit not one who officiated at that kind of level. I've watches the replays several times and I'm not convinced it was a goal. Neither am I saying it definitely wasn't legitimate - several prominent commentators fail to agree. My point is that the referee should at the very least have spoken with his assistant. If TV replays can't be conclusive, I'm not sure how he could have been so certain.

I love football whoever is watching, I've even in the past gone to watch games at Ibrox as a neutral. I dislike tribalism and of course sectarianism adds a new dimension to that. If Rangers want to recreate themselves as a people's club, they should start by alienating themselves from the idiots who seem to believe the club was created in 1690...

Thank's for the encouragement anyway, I do find the newco Rangers "interesting" but not for the same reasons others do. I should probably write a lot more about Albion Rovers and Morton, as the struggles of such clubs are also not well-documented by the mainstream media.

Carntyne said...


A wonderfully coherent article.

On the subject of goal or no goal.

I think a good way of deciding the matter is to ask what has happened in previous incidents.

Barging into the goalkeeper post 1950s/60s, especially on the goal line, is almost always rewarded with a free kick against the forward.

Well over 90% of the time.

Only very occasionally is a goal awarded in such circumstances.

I am sure the fact that 'The' Rangers were 1-0 down and looking desperate, played no part in the decision in this case.

Andrew said...

In regards the goal, I can only hope that Ally McCoist praises the "bravery" of the referee when a team scores a similar "goal" against Rangers...

Elsewhere, a Rangers fan has pointed out that "Rovers hardly ever touched the ball". Well, the BBC website stats for the game (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26404296) show we had 40% possession. Little in the way of shots on target, but those stats don't tell the whole story...

Anonymous said...

Your an absolute discrace, a discrace.Do you even know what your talking about? Rangers were not lucky yes we were not our normal selfs but no way lucky we could of won by 4 or 5 goals if the linesman was up to standard.And sectariansm, no I don't think so, you forget we are a family club now, a family club but no dout you wont know what one of those is at albion rovers. You are completely wrong and not a football fan at all just someone who hates the rangers well you can go fuck yourself you and your pathetic team, you will be thrashed in the replay anyway and never be heard of again. Hope you enjoyed your one day in the big time coz it wont be happenign again.

Andrew said...

Hi Anonymous (I'm guessing you're not the same as the previous anonymous contributors).

Thanks for your comments. Clearly you're passionate about your club.

In answering your points:

1) I know what I'm talking about. That doesn't mean I'm always right. I am giving my own take on a game I watched a few days ago. Other people watching the same game may well have different interpretations of events.

2) Rangers were not lucky? Well, that's a matter of opinion, I suppose. If their forwards had been less wasteful, if their play had been more creative, if the Rovers' goalkeeper hadn't been in such confident form, who knows? I'm not really sure where you're coming from in regards the officials - if there were any decisions in dispute then surely the Rangers goal has to be it. Aside from that, I thought they had a decent afternoon.

3) No sectarianism at Rangers? Really? Look, I'm not looking to tar all Rangers fans with that brush, but it's everywhere. You just have to open your eyes. It is true that Celtic and Rangers have been seen in recent years to be stamping out bigotry and sectarianism, but there is still a huge amount of work to be done and I'd argue one club has been moderately more successful than the other on this score. No doubt it takes time to change a culture, but accepting or denying reality rather than challenging it won't help.


4) Albion Rovers don't know what a "family club" is? Maybe you should come to Cliftonhill and find out.

5) I'm not a football fan? Well, anyone who knows me would disagree. The fact that someone doesn't share your perspectives doesn't mean they don't love the game. I am sure you're a real football fan; please give the same respect to others.

6) I hate Rangers? Not quite. I passionately dislike the culture surrounding the club. That's not the same thing.

7) "My pathetic team" - come on, it was (as someone above pointed out) a good sporting contest. As for the replay - well, the smart money has to be on a Rangers win but the draw will have given Rovers confidence. I'm sure we'll be heard of again - we've been around since 1882 and don't plan to disappear yet!

8) Yes, I enjoyed the game - thanks. Hope you did too. No need to be so resentful.

Anonymous said...

At least he called them by their proper name "The Rangers".
And as a supporter of another "pathetic" team who had to sit and listen to the sectarian guff from them and their ugly sister I can but offer my sympathy. Never mind though as soon enough they will be marching onwards and upwards by at least one league for now.